The Hindu Justice : Babri Mosque Splits in Three
Decision of Ayodhya Babri Mosque after 18 years shocked Muslims of this subcontinent, might they are not surprised by the decision. What could you expect from so called biggest democratic government of INDIA ? However, it ruled that the land be split among three contesting parties — Hindu Mahasabha, Nirmohi Akhara and Sunni Waqf Board — equally.
From one prospect it looks like that it’s a good decision for brotherhood, but this raises one question is this a justice? How comes your house been divided among two other parties because they claimed once some 3000 years before their forefathers use to live at this place.
There is not a single evidence of RAM Mandir been proven , but Babri Mosque certainly is 600 years old. This is norm in India from Hindus to claim any mosque claiming Mandir property, so to demolish that mosque.
However, today INDIA proves that they are dummies and they have rubber courts to justify. Hindu cannot justify this is in its blood.
Why Babri Mosque was Demolished on 6th December ?
Because in 1225 A.D ,Sultan Mehmood Ghaznavi demolished one side of Somnath Temple. And that event was to be dated 6th December. So the Hindus of India Decided in before the beginning of 21st Century in 1992 to Demolish Babri Mosque on 6th December.
Why India got saved from any bad incident or from any type of rational protests ?
Because the whole decision was against Muslims , and actual this is the victory for Hindu Ram Mandir advocates . Actual , Muslim property now being divided among three parties. Muslims , Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara.
WHAT THE JUDGES SAID
Justice S U Khan
“Disputed structure was constructed as mosque by or under orders of Babar. It is not proved by direct evidence that premises in dispute including constructed portion belong to Babar or the person who constructed the mosque. No temple was demolished for constructing the mosque, but it was constructed on the ruins of the temple or some of its material was used in the construction of the mosque.”
Justice Sudhir Agarwal
” It is declared that the area covered by the central dome of the three domed structure, the disputed structure being the deity of Bhagwan Ram Janma Sthan and place of birth of Lord Rama as per faith and belief of the Hindus, belong to plaintiff- Bhagwan Sri Ram Virajman. and shall not be obstructed or interfered in any manner by the defendants, Rajendra Singh and others.”
Justice Dharam Veer Sharma
” The disputed site is the birth place of Lord Rama. Disputed building was constructed by Babar, the year is not certain, but it was built against the tenets of Islam. Thus it cannot have the character of a mosque. The disputed structure was constructed on the site of old structure after demolition of the same. The ASI has proved that the structure was a massive Hindu religious structure. The idols were placed in the middle dome of the disputed structure in the intervening night of 22/23 December 1949.”